Sunday, December 8, 2013

"No Room in the Inn"? The Birth of Jesus. Is Something Missing in My Life? NAFTA. RIP Punkie.


For "Scripture Sunday":

Was There Really "No Room in the Inn"?

"Most have taken for granted Jesus' nativity story as commonly related - that when Joseph and Mary arrived in Bethlehem there was no room in an inn so Mary ended up giving birth to Jesus in a stable. But is this the true account in Scripture? See for yourself!

Was There Really "No Room in the Inn"?

The Greek word translated "inn" in Luke 2:7 refers to a guest room.

A typical translation of Luke 2:7 says about Mary giving birth to Jesus, "And she brought forth her firstborn Son, and wrapped Him in swaddling clothes, and laid Him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn" (New King James Version).

We've grown up hearing the account that the "inn" in Bethlehem was full, with no "room" available, so Joseph and Mary ended up in a stable, with Jesus Christ born and laid in a manger there. This image has been used to promote the typical Christmas nativity scene for generations. Yet a careful analysis of the biblical text reveals quite a different story!

Not an inn but a guest room

The New Testament was originally written in Greek, and the Greek word translated "inn" here is kataluma. It means a place of rest, usually a guest room. In fact, the same writer Luke uses this very word later where it clearly refers to a guest room and not an inn. Notice Luke 22:11, where Jesus said to His disciples, "Then you shall say to the master of the house, 'The Teacher says to you, "'Where is the guest room [ kataluma ] where I may eat the Passover with My disciples?"'"

Furthermore, Luke elsewhere in his Gospel uses a different Greek word when he writes about an actual inn— not the word kataluma. In the parable of the Good Samaritan, Jesus mentions that the injured man in the story was taken to an inn—and here Luke translates using the Greek word pandokheion, the normal word for an inn. We read this in Luke 10:34, where the kind Samaritan set the injured man "on his own animal, brought him to an inn, and took care of him."

Interestingly, the Arabic and Syriac versions of the New Testament, which reflect more of a Middle Eastern context, have never translated kataluma as meaning an inn, but instead as a guest room. As Kenneth Bailey, a Middle Eastern and New Testament scholar points out, "This translation [of the word as 'inn'] is a product of our Western heritage" ("The Manger and the Inn: The Cultural Background of Luke 2:7," Bible and Spade, Fall 2007, p. 103).

In addition, Young's Literal Translation uses the term "guest-chamber" instead of an inn. It says: "And she brought forth her son—the first-born, and wrapped him up, and laid him down in the manger, because there was not for them a place in the guest-chamber."

Note also the word here translated "place" or "room." In the context of "inn," most assume this is referring to an individual room ("no room in the inn"), yet even inns of that time did not often have individual rooms. The reference is simply to space. What Luke is telling us is that there was not enough room, or enough space, for them in the guest room.

The linguistic evidence shows that Luke used the term kataluma to mean not an inn, but the guest room indeed, "the" guest room (the definite article is used) of a particular house.

Historical factors

The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, after pointing out that the word kataluma is used elsewhere in the Gospels for the guest chamber of a private home, comments: "Was the 'inn' at Bethlehem, where Joseph and Mary sought a night's lodging, an upper guest room in a private home or some kind of public place for travelers? The question cannot be answered with certainty. It is thought by some that it may have been a guest chamber provided by the community. We know that visitors to the annual feasts in Jerusalem were entertained in the guest rooms of private homes" (1982, Vol. 2, "Inn," p. 826).

Another factor that powerfully argues against this term meaning an inn is that these places were not appropriate to giving birth to a child. Inns at that time were far from anything like typical motels or hotels we might think of today. "Generally speaking, inns had a bad reputation . . . This ill repute of public inns, together with the Semitic spirit of hospitality, led the Jews and the early Christians to recommend the keeping of an open house for the benefit of strangers" (ibid.).

Besides, for commercial reasons inns were usually found along the major roads. Yet Bethlehem was a small town in the upper mountains of Judea, and no major Roman road is known to have passed through it. Since it seems to have been an insignificant village at the time, it's doubtful that an inn even existed there then.

This gives yet more reason to realize that what Luke really wrote is that there was no room in the guest chamber. Certainly, due to the Roman census being taken at the time and the huge number of people traveling to their birthplaces, available space in the guest quarters was scarce.

So the question then becomes: Does that mean Joseph and Mary aimed to stay in someone's home but, since the guest room was full, were turned out into the night to a stable? When Mary was in labor? That might seem worse than being turned away from an inn. Of course, both scenarios seem rather terrible—certainly downright inhospitable, which is far out of line from the way things were at that time.

A culture of hospitality and honoring kinship

In Christ's day, hospitality to visitors among the Jews was essential, based on biblical example and law. In Deuteronomy 10:19, God told the Israelites to "love the stranger." And Leviticus 19:33
stated, "If a stranger dwells with you in your land, you shall not mistreat him." Denial of hospitality was shown throughout Scripture to be an outrage. Hospitality toward visitors is still important throughout the Middle East.

Moreover, since Bethlehem was Joseph's ancestral home, he probably had relatives there. And being a descendant of King David, whose hometown this was, he would have been highly respected upon his arrival. Think of a descendant of George Washington coming to his hometown of Alexandria, Virginia, after a long lapse of time. The townspeople would've shown him respect.

Note that it is only the manger, an animal food or water trough, that gives any indication of a stable. And indeed a manger might well have been found in a stable. But it's important to realize that they were also to be found within first-century homes!

A typical Judean house of that day consisted of an area near the door, often with a dirt floor, where the family's animals were kept at night—so they wouldn't be stolen or preyed upon and so their body heat could help warm the home on cool nights. The family lived and slept in a raised part of the same room set back from the door. There was also usually a guest room either upstairs on a second floor or adjoining the family common room on the lower floor. Typically the lower area near the door had a manger for food and/or water for the animals.

So what actually happened?" 

Complete article at:  Article by Mario Seiglie and Tom Robinson


Bet You Didn't Know: Christmas

"Did you know Christmas wasn't always celebrated on December 25th?  Get the whole story behind the holiday."  History Channel video: (2:45)


The Birth of Jesus

"Christ and the early Church didn’t celebrate Christmas. Why? If you strip it of its commercialism, pre-Christian customs and inaccuracies, what do you learn?"

Was the birth of Jesus really on Dec. 25? What else is questionable about Christmas?Was the birth of Jesus really on Dec. 25? What else is questionable about Christmas?

Today, Christmas has become a nostalgic icon of a past that never was. Santa Claus, the Christmas tree and lots of gifts take center stage in Christian and non-Christian homes.

But these and other customs have little connection to the Bible and the true story of the birth of Jesus, or the message and meaning of His first coming. While the Bible teaches a great deal about Jesus and His message through the story of the birth of Jesus Christ (“Christ” means “messiah” or “anointed”), the traditions of Christmas often mislead, misinform and even contradict the Scriptures!

Would you be surprised to learn that the Bible doesn’t say when Jesus Christ was born? That the early New Testament Church didn’t celebrate Christmas? That Christmas was banned by the Puritans of New England? Or that some Christians today do not celebrate Christmas for biblical and doctrinal reasons?

Why?   Honoring Christ?

The primary problem is that the roots of Christmas lie in polytheistic, pagan religious practices, rather than in Christian ones. The New Testament Church honored Christ as the One who came to deliver us from error, darkness and sin. Having turned from paganism to follow Christ, early Christians would never have continued in the practices of paganism in an effort to honor Him!

The apostle Paul wrote, “For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Walk as children of light (for the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness, righteousness, and truth), finding out what is acceptable to the Lord. And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them” (Ephesians 5:8-11).

If something is grounded in practices dedicated to pagan worship and false gods, continuing in such “unfruitful works of darkness” would have been a fundamental violation of the allegiance and obedience they were pledging, as Christians, to their Savior and King!

No wonder, then, that the New Testament Church did not observe Christmas.

When did “Christmas” become “Christian”?

The World Book Encyclopedia explains, “The first mention of the celebration of Christmas occurred in A.D. 336 in an early Roman calendar, which indicates December 25 as the day of observance” (1990, article “Christmas”). Notice this first mention of Christmas is more than 300 years after Christ’s lifetime! The date of Christ’s birth is not recorded in the Bible. So why did they pick Dec. 25?

“This celebration was probably influenced by pagan (unchristian) festivals held at that time. The ancient Romans held year-end celebrations to honor Saturn, their harvest god; and Mithras, the god of light. Various peoples in northern Europe held festivals in mid-December to celebrate the end of the harvest season. … [Their] customs gradually became part of the Christmas celebration” (ibid.).

Even religious people who celebrate Christmas have written about its non-Christian roots. Consider this history from the “Grace to You” website: “The decision to celebrate Christmas on December 25 was made sometime during the fourth century by church bishops in Rome. They had a specific reason for doing so.

“Having turned long ago from worshiping the one true God and creator of all things, many early cultures in the Roman empire had fallen into sun worship. Recognizing their dependence on the sun’s yearly course in the heavens, they held feasts around the winter solstice in December when the days are shortest. As part of their festivals, they built bonfires to give the sun god strength and bring him back to life again. When it became apparent that the days were growing longer, there would be great rejoicing.

“The church leaders in Rome decided to celebrate Christ’s birth during the winter solstice in an attempt to Christianize these popular pagan celebrations. For the most part their efforts failed to make the people conform, and the heathen festivities continued.”

“An affront unto the grace of God”
Is adopting pagan customs acceptable to God?

“It’s common knowledge that Christmas and its customs have nothing to do with the Bible. … The theological question is quite simple: Is it acceptable to God for humans to choose to worship Him by adopting paganism’s most popular celebrations and calling them Christian?”

The Roman festivals were characterized by licentiousness—a trait that continued to characterize the supposedly Christian holiday through the centuries.

Over the decades, parents have told children about Santa Claus and his workshop at the North Pole. Where in the Bible does God excuse lying—especially to our children?

Even gift-giving customs have non-Christian roots. In his book 4,000 Years of Christmas: A Gift From the Ages (1997), Episcopal priest Earl Count relates historical connections between exchanging gifts on the 12 days of Christmas with the customs of ancient, pagan Babylon. He shows that mistletoe was adopted from Druid mystery rituals and that Dec. 25 derives from the ancient Roman Saturnalia rather than with Jesus.

What of the wise men?

That’s not the only biblical fact that Christmas customs have wrong. Joe Kovacs, author of Shocked by the Bible, points out, “If asked how many wise men were present at the Bethlehem manger when Jesus was born, most people would likely answer, ‘Three.’ They would be wrong. The correct answer from the Bible is actually … zero!” (2008, p. 3).

What difference does it make?

Some will wonder, “What difference does it make? Those pagan customs now have ‘Christian meanings.’ Doesn’t that make them acceptable?”

If we leave the decision up to human opinion, the debate could probably go on endlessly. But God specifically addresses the issue of what customs to use in worshipping Him. We should look to the Bible for the answer.

It’s found in Deuteronomy 12:29-32: “When the LORD your God cuts off from before you the nations which you go to dispossess, … take heed to yourself that you are not ensnared to follow them, after they are destroyed from before you, and that you do not inquire after their gods, saying, ‘How did these nations serve their gods? I also will do likewise.’ You shall not worship the LORD your God in that way; for every abomination to the LORD which He hates they have done to their gods; for they burn even their sons and daughters in the fire to their gods. Whatever I command you, be careful to observe it; you shall not add to it nor take away from it.”

To the devoutly religious Pharisees, Jesus said in Mark 7:6-9: “Well did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written: ‘This people honors Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me. And in vain they worship Me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.’ For laying aside the commandment of God, you hold the tradition of men. … All too well you reject the commandment of God, that you may keep your tradition.”

So in God’s eyes, it does make a difference. He wants to be worshipped the way He instructed."  Complete article at:   by James Capo


In Search of Christmas 

U.S. News & World Report

Imagine a purer, less commercial, more spiritual Christmas. But don't call it history.

"The only problem is that, as historians are increasingly discovering, this purer, simpler, more spiritual past is more a product of our cultural imagination than of historical fact. A series of new studies suggests that the observance of Christmas was never an entirely religious affair, that many of the most popular seasonal traditions are relatively modern inventions and that complaints of crass overindulgence and gross commercialism are nearly as old as the holiday itself."  From:


The program on WGN TV this morning:

Is Something Missing in My Life?

"Is your life so busy you can't seem to get everything done? Even so, is something still lacking? Learn more."


Transcript at:


On This Day:

NAFTA signed into law, Dec 8, 1993:

"The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is signed into law by President Bill Clinton. Clinton said he hoped the agreement would encourage other nations to work toward a broader world-trade pact.

NAFTA, a trade pact between the United States, Canada, and Mexico, eliminated virtually all tariffs and trade restrictions between the three nations. The passage of NAFTA was one of Clinton's first major victories as the first Democratic president in 12 years--though the movement for free trade in North America had begun as a Republican initiative.

During its planning stages, NAFTA was heavily criticized by Reform Party presidential candidate Ross Perot, who argued that if NAFTA was passed, Americans would hear a "giant sucking sound" of American companies fleeing the United States for Mexico, where employees would work for less pay and without benefits. The pact, which took effect on January 1, 1994, created the world's largest free-trade zone."



After a couple of checks during the night, when I woke up, the first thing was to see if Punkie, the sick, old dog, had made it through the night.  She had, but she was so weak.  She was already wearing a sweater, but I still put one of Misty's cozy coats on her, carried her outside, let her do her thing, and carried her back inside.  Then I tried to feed her and give her more electrolyte water.  She was suffering, so I was, too. 

After tending to all the other animals, I knew that something had to be done about Punkie.  I called her Mom who said that she should have had Punkie PTS a week ago, and gave me permission to have it done. 

After calling the vet, I asked Ray if he would drive me there.  I didn't want to drive myself and have to put Punkie in a carrier, I wanted to hold her and make her feel loved and safe.  The vet was expecting us, and we didn't have to wait long.  He saw Punkie's condition, gave her a shot in the arm, and she went to sleep in my arms. So Punkie is now at peace.  The vet tech put her in a cardboard casket so she can go home to Mindi's ranch and be buried there.   Punkie is the fourth of Mindi's poodles that have gone to Rainbow Bridge in the 15 years that I have known them. 

Ray dropped me off at the church, but I was a few minutes late.  They usually start with a couple of songs, and I arrived during the second one.  Then we had the continued Bible reading of Genesis 25:19 – Genesis 28:9, about Isaac and Esau,  and then Malachi 1:1-28. 

For the main song service they usually have the words of the songs on a projector screen, but the bulb had gone out, or just didn't want to work due to the cold.  Jeff, our guitarist, usually has the program all planned, but this time we chose songs from a hymnal.  During the prayers for those in need, I asked for prayers for my ex-daughter-in-law, Becky, who after having a double mastectomy, now has cancer throughout her body.

Jeff gave the talk, and it was more on the subject of prophecy. This time about "The Date Setters".   In Matthew 24:3 the disciples asked Jesus about the signs of the time of the end of the world, and He told them.  Then in Matthew 24:36 He says that no one knows that day or hour, but My Father only.  Jeff told us about many of the people throughout time, even as far back as 3200 BC, who have predicted the time of the end, and obviously have been wrong.  Among them were emperors, mathematicians, astrologers, preachers, astronomers, rabbis, popes, all of different religions.  Even Christopher Columbus made a prediction.  Good examples of the foretold 'false prophets'.  Just shows you that man should go by the Bible, not by what man thinks.

For the potluck, I had made a crockpot vegetable soup with homemade turkey broth, but didn't have time to go home to get it after the vet.  So I will have to eat some, and freeze some.  Fortunately, there was plenty of food for me to have a bite, good fellowship and discussions with the other diners.  When I called Ray asking him to come and get me,  he came in the dining hall and met the people there.  They gave him a warm welcome and offered him some potluck, but he declined.  I needed to get home and let the dogs out, anyway. 

I took all the dogs out in the cold, some wearing their coats, and Caesar looked at me as if to say "Where's Punkie?" and then went back to sniffing the back yard.  By this time, I was tired out, and wanted to lie down for a nap, but Misty gave her little "I'm hungry" bark, so I was back in feeding mode for the remaining 4 doggie boarders, my dog, and the three cats. 

Ann, the previous foster mom of Ava, my 'new' old cat, didn't advise my sending Ava back, as the situation had changed at her house.  She was re-fostering an adoption return in Ava's place, and Ann said that Ava and this cat did not get along, and it tormented Ava.  It sounded like Ava would be very unhappy and have bad time. To make sweet, gentle Ava go back there would be cruel, and I couldn't do that to her.  I knew that with all the fosters that Ann has, that Ava would get more attention, love and care here in her old age, so I have been taking allergy pills each day.


Dizzy-Dick said...

There is so much misinterpretation in the Bible. People just take a lot for granted.

Rod Ivers said...

Perhaps Mindi couldn't bear to meet the final conclusion for Punkie and left it for you... That didn't make your job very easy, but you have taken care of a friend in the process... May Gods peace be with you.. Rod

LakeConroePenny,TX said...

Hi DD and Rod, Thank you for your comments.

DD, Sometimes it means going back to the original manuscripts, the ones that have been found, to get at the truth.
The King James Bible even had a lot of the "Jewishness" taken out of it when it was written. Many of the different religions put they own slant on things when they were translating the Scriptures.

Rod, Mindi was hoping that Punkie would just peacefully die in her arms, like the other old dogs did.
She had never had a dog PTS, and didn't know that it is just a little shot in the arm.

But Punkie was miserable and doubled up in pain. I can't stand to see an animal suffer, and when it is Misty's turn, I will be ready and glad to stop her suffering.

Happy Tails and Trails, Penny.

Gypsy said...

I'm so glad Punkie had someone like you to hold her during her last moments.

LakeConroePenny,TX said...

Thank you, Gypsy.

There was no way that I wasn't going to be there, holding her, and talking to her. In fact that was a stipulation when I took her to the vet.
I could have taken her to another vet a lot closer, but they wouldn't let me be with her.

Happy Tails and Trails, Penny